grenfell towers and 9/11

[fobrien1]

before i get any complaints no im not saying the uk grenfell fire was started intentionally or that it is related to 9/11 .

my point about the terrible and tragic grenfell tower fire is that it was a 24 story council building , nothing special about these towers , except as we tragically found out they are not safe .

world trade 7 was a 48 story building that had some serious work done on it to make even stronger . that building burned for several hours with just small areas of fire in different areas . grenfell burned RAGED for over 24 hours .

wtc7 which had extensive work done on it and many millions spent to strengthen it collapsed at about 5pm or so on 9/11 having sustained very little damage and with small areas of fire . no planes hit wt7 .

yet grenfell towers a very cheap building in terms of cost when compared to wt7 and a building that had none of the many millions spent on it that wtc7 had to strengthen it blazed and was a raging inferno for over 24 hours . that building still stands .

now im not trying to drag the tragic grenfell victims into anything , and no disrespect or offense at all is intended . im merely using this as a means to show that tower can burn and rage for over 24 hours and not collapse in on it self .

wt7 for atleast part of its collapsed fell at free fall speed . NIST tried to say otherwise . they now admit that this is accurate and true information , that wt7 fell atleast in part at free fall speed . this is impossible .

free fall speed is explained like this . go on a roof of a 48 floor building and drop a tennis ball over the side . what will happen ? , the ball will drop unmolested untill it hits the ground below . nothing is in the way to impeed the ball other than fresh air . thats an explanation of free fall . a building with 48 floors that collapses means that each floor from the top down will fall one on top of the other . so floor 48 lands on floor 47 and 47 lands on 46 and so on . that slows the collapse as each floor meets resistance . that didnt happen in the case of wt7 (atleast for part of its collapse ) , what happened was that the building fell from the top down in free fall speed . none of the top floors met any resistance . some 1300 engineers agree with this and nist had to reluctantly admit its true .

so how did these floors fall and not land on each other and slow the speed of the collapse ? , the only way is if there is no resistance , if the each floor below is removed , that is its support structure .